economical Accu Measure or more trouble than it's worth?
Okay, so here's the deal: A few years after the original Accu measure plastic
caliper came out, the Accu Fitness company decided to go high tech and create
another model of caliper for personal self testing, only this time it was a little
palm-sized electronic pincher gizmo with a microprocessor that sets you back
about $49 bucks. It was called the Fat Track (and most recently, the Fat Track II
or Fat Track Gold which comes with a tape measure called a "Myotape").
This electronic caliper has some neat benefits. You pinch yourself at three sites
instead of one, which you would presume, increases accuracy. You also get an
instant digital readout, so you don't need to look up your body fat percentage on
those cumbersome interpretation charts.
It all sounds great in theory, but in my opinion, it's not quite as easy in the real
world. In the majority of the users I've surveyed, I found that the Fat Track is
MORE difficult to use than the $20 plastic Accu Measure caliper. I have a theory
about why this is true: First, if you haven't mastered the technique, then three
skinfold sites can increase your margin for error, not decrease it. Second, the Fat
Track uses a totally different spring mechanism and caliper jaws than ANY of the
standard calipers which have been research tested for accuracy. Third, the Fat
Track requires a thigh skinfold. You'd think using a body fat formula that measures
lower body would increase accuracy, and it might if the measurement were
perfect. What most people don't realize is that the thigh skinfold can be very tricky
to pinch on many people. The skin just doesn't pull away from the thigh muscle in
a clean U-shaped fold all the time, and sometimes it clings to the muscle so tightly
you can hardly grab it at all. The abdominal and chest skinfolds sometimes present
similar problems. On the other hand, the iliac crest skinfold used with the plastic
Accu measure, is a no-brainer – it's the easiest place to pinch.
I own a Fat Track, but I don't use it. I gave up after I kept getting inconsistent
measurements. I know the same thing happened to many of my clients who tried
it. However, if you own a Fat Track II (or were thinking about getting one), I'm not
telling you not to use it, just advising you about the pros and cons. I believe it
could be accurate (and convenient for home self-testing) if you master the
pinching technique and have no problem with the required skinfold sites. There's a
learning curve associated with ANY skinfold testing device. It's possible I may have
thrown in the towel before I learned how to use the darn thing properly (never was
any good with electronic gadgets anyway... but whaddya expect, I'm just a "muscle
head" from New Jersey!)